Excerpts from Photosynthesis Methods and Materials Sections
Good Excerpts
Note that while none of these quotes would stand alone as a good Methods and Materials section, a number of these ideas combined together might do quite nicely.
♦ The chromatography paper was laid on a piece of clean paper and subsequently, a spinach leaf was placed on top of the chromatography paper. The edge of a dime was rolled over the leaf to transfer the leaf pigment and create a stripe across the chromatography paper, about 1.5 cm from one end. The leaf was repositioned and this process was repeated several times on the same place on the paper until a dark color was obtained.
♦ The edge of a penny was used to roll a stripe of the spinach across the paper about 2 cm above the end of the chromatography paper. Then the spinach leaf was moved so a new portion of the leaf was over the first stripe and re-rolled to darken the stripe.
♦ With a T-pin, the “top” end (the end without the pigment stripe) of the paper was attached to the bottom of the rubber stopper.
♦ As the chromatography solution was absorbed by the paper, the plant pigments traveled up the paper at differing rates, thus were separated into bands of individual pigments. When the farthest band was about 1 cm away from the stopper, the paper was removed from the flask.
♦ As the solution was absorbed by the chromatography paper, it carried the pigments from the stripe up the paper.
♦ Using scissors, the pigment bands were cut from the chromatography paper. Each band was placed into a separate 13 × 100 test tube containing 5 mL of 100% ethanol. Multiple bands of identical pigments were placed into the same test tubes as each other to make the solutions as concentrated as possible.
♦ The identical bands were cut apart and redissolved in 100% ethanol in separate 13 × 100 test tubes.
♦ A dilute solution of each of the colors of food coloring (red, yellow, green, blue) was made by placing one drop of the concentrate in a small beaker containing 30 mL of 100% ethanol. (— or whatever the ratio actually was)
♦ Absorbance readings for each leaf pigment and color of food coloring were acquired for wavelengths from 350 to 800 nm at 25 nm intervals. Graphs were constructed for each pigment to show maximum and minimum absorption points.
♦ Using a spectrophotometer, absorbance reading were obtained for all the pigments and food colorings at 25 nm intervals from 350 to 800 nm.
♦ A one-holed rubber stopper with a bent 1-mL pipet placed in the hole was used to cap each of the test tubes. Prior to capping, each tube was filled with sufficient solution such that the liquid subsequently filled about ¼ of the pipet.
♦ Eight test tubes
containing Elodea were exposed to different lighting conditions to
determine in which setting the most photosynthesis occurred as evidenced by
the amount of oxygen produced. (— plus a brief description of the contents
of each tube)
[Remember that
Elodea is a genus name, thus should be italicized.]
♦ The amounts of oxygen evolved by photosynthesis under different colors of light were calculated as a percentage of the rate (in milliliters of oxygen evolved per minute) in white light. (— This is sufficient, and there is no need to go into the minute details of how the calculations were performed.)
Not So Good Excerpts (including some grammatical problems)
♦ In this lab, the following materials were used: (followed
by a list).
[Materials should be
included in the narrative as you relate what was done, not listed
separately.]
♦ There are three parts to this experiment, they will be in
sequence into which they were done. In Part A the class used. . .
[The first “sentence” really is two, and should
have a period in the middle. This first sentence really is unnecessary —
the division into “parts” is purely because of our time constraints and the
experiment could just as easily be done all in one (longer) day. Items used
should not be listed separately, but should be mentioned (and described) in
the narrative when used. There are other grammatical problems here,
too.]
♦ The procedure for this experiment began with filling a
250 mL Erlenmeyer flask with. . .
[Do
not start your narrative in this manner. Simply state that, “A 250-mL
Erlenmeyer flask was filled with. . .”]
♦ Graphs were . . . entered into the class computer and
distributed among the class.
[This
information/procedure is neither critical to nor specific to this experiment,
nor did we enter graphs into the computer.]
♦ It is important to keep the paper as clean as possible and
only handle it by the edges. . . The flask was capped so that the air in the
flask could become saturated with fumes so that the chromatography would run
properly. . . Carefully turn the stopper upside down on the flask so that
while the paper is being pinned in place, no fumes escape. . . It is important
to keep the flask covered while doing this, to keep all the fumes inside.
[Assume your reader is scientifically
literate and knows what paper chromatography is all about. This experiment
was not about how to do paper chromatography by itself, but this technique
was used to obtain information about plant leaf pigments. Also,
remember to report what was done in this experiment, not give orders
to someone else. Additionally, the verbs used here do not “match” but switch
from “(you) do xxx” to “xxx was done,” and back again.]
♦ In photosynthesis experiment, paper chromatography filter
paper should be taken and spinach placed on top with rolling a coin across to
spinach line across to the filter paper. Then placing the filter paper onto
the rubber stopper with a t-pin and submit it into the flask with solution
letting the tip of the paper dip into the solution.
[Always check, recheck, and proofread.
Make sure your grammar and sentence structure make sense. Read your
composition aloud to someone else and/or have someone read your composition
aloud to you. Do not use the “implied you” verb form. Do make sure all your
verb tenses match. Avoid using the word “take” unless you really obtained
something and physically carried it to another location as an important step
in some process.]
♦ Add a few millimeters of the 90% petroleum ether to 10%
acetone solution to the Erlenmeyer flask and put the stopper on the flask.
[Do not use the “implied you” verb form.
You should tell what was done, not give orders. This sentence could be
reworded as, “A few millimeters of the 90% petroleum ether to 10% acetone
solution were added to an Erlenmeyer flask, and the stopper was placed on the
flask.”]
♦ The chromatography paper was then pinned to the bottom of
a #8 stopper. This was then put in a solution of 90% EtOH and 10%
acetone.
[Was the whole paper plus
stopper submerged in the solution? The chromatography solvent system we used
did not contain ethanol. In this case, “ethanol” should be written out (if
it was correct).]
♦ The T-pin attaches the non-pigment side to the top of the
stopper which needs to be folded over so that only the tip is in the solution.
[This person probably meant the
end of the paper without the pigment. The paper was pinned to
the bottom of the stopper. How was the stopper folded over so
only the tip was in the solution? Again, do not use implied you sentence
structure.]
♦ When the farthest band is about 1 cm from the stopper, the
paper should be removed from the flask.
[Remember, you’re not giving instructions to
someone else. This sentence should read, “When the farthest band was about
1 cm from the stopper, the paper was removed from the flask.”]
♦ When finished there will be five different colors on the
chromatography paper. These five different colors have a name, at the very
top are carotenes, the next down is xanthophyll, then chlorophyll a,
chlorophyll b, and then the spinach.
[Do NOT include data in the Methods and
Materials section! There are other grammatical problems here, too.]
♦ The spectra of pigment’s lab are done to show the absorbance
levels of the different pigments at different wavelengths.
[“Lab” does not belong to “pigment,” so don’t
use apostrophe—s here. Does this person mean to say, “The spectra are
done,” or “The lab was done?”]
♦ To do this, each pigment and food coloring was placed into
its own cuvette. Also, the machine had to be zeroed before each reading with
a cuvette of 100% ethanol.
[Assume a
scientifically-literate reader knows (or can find out) the procedure for
general operation of a spectrophotometer. Again, the spectrophotometer was
only used as a tool, and knowing how to adjust it is not the core of this
experiment.]
♦ . . . the four different food colorings. . .
[should be reworded as “. . . red, yellow,
green, and blue food colorings. . .”]
♦ Grind a piece of spinach leaf with a mortar and pestle.
Add 100% EtOH to extract the plant pigments.
[We didn’t do this. Also, here’s that implied
you, again. Write out “ethanol.”]
♦ Two groups of students should grind a piece of spinach and
the other group grinds some dried parley with a mortar and pestle. . .
[You are not giving instructions to groups
of students, but rather, telling what was done. Also, no spinach was ground
in this manner. It is not critical to this experiment that the work was done
by students and/or in groups. How many “groups”, how many tests/trials, were
actually involved?
This makes it sound like there were two groups which tested spinach plus a third
group which tested parsley, though I suspect the writer may have meant that
one group tested spinach while the another tested parsley. This could be
reworded as, “Some dried parley was ground with a mortar and pestle. . .”, but
it would be even better to specify how much parsley (and how much ethanol)
was used.]
♦ The final part of the experiment (or “Part C of the
experiment”) was done to determine the oxygen evolution by photosynthesis.
[Spreading of the experiment over three
lab periods was an artificial division that was not critical to obtaining
good results, thus probably does not need to be mentioned in this manner.
This sentence could be reworded something like, “The oxygen evolved by
photosynthesis under different colors of light was determined from measurements
of fluid levels of bicarbonate solutions containing photosynthesizing plants.”]
♦ All of the solutions were recorded.
[This person probably meant “The fluid level in
each of the pipets was recorded.”]
♦ After 20 min, a reading was taken.
[Be more specific about what is being done here.
This could be reworded as, “After 20 min, the fluid levels in the pipets were
read.”]
♦ After another 20 min, they should be recorded again and
they should be moved into the dark. After the tubes are in the dark, the
readings should be taken again.
[Who
is “they?” How long in the dark? What readings should be taken?]
♦ All glassware should be cleaned and scraps of paper should
be disposed of. . . Data should be entered in the computer.
[Yes, but this doesn’t belong in your experiment
write-up. While freshman biology students frequently need to be reminded of
such things, universal, common-sense procedures like cleaning up after
oneself and recording one’s data are “givens” that should not be stated in a
scientific paper. Once again, this is incorrectly written as though giving
directions, rather than recounting what was done.]