The following system of symbols (called the Trewartha Modification of the Koppen Classification System) is one that is used to classify various types of climates:
A — Tropical forest climates with no cool season; fairly constant warm temperature | ||
Af: | constantly moist; rainfall all through the year | |
Aw: | distinct dry season in winter (Savanna). | |
Am: | monsoon rain; short, dry season, but with sufficient total rainfall to support rain forest | |
B — Dry climates (precipitation variable and effectiveness dependent upon the rate of evaporation, which in turn, varies directly with temperature) | ||
Bs: | semi-arid climates (Steppe) | |
Bw: | desert and arid climates (Wuste) | |
h: | (heiss) tropical or low-latitude — hot (heiss = German for “hot”) | |
k: | (kalt) cold or middle-latitude (kalt = German for “cold”) | |
C — Mesothermal (warm temperature) forest climates with cooler but mild winters (coldest month above 32° F [0° C]; warmest month above 50° F [10° C] (meso = middle; thermo = heat) | ||
Cf: | no distinct dry season | |
Cw: | dry season in winter | |
Cs: | dry season in summer (Mediterranean type — medi = middle; terra = earth, land) | |
a: | hot summer (warmest month over 71.6° F [22° C]) | |
b: | cool summer (warmest month under 71.6° F [22° C]) | |
c: | cool, short summer; less that 4 months over 50° F [10° C] | |
D — Microthermal (cold, snowy) forest climates with severe winters (coldest month below 32° F; warmest month above 50° F [10° C]) | ||
Df: | no dry season | |
Dw: | dry winters | |
a: | hot summer (warmest month over 71.6° F [22° C]) | |
b: | cool summer (warmest month under 71.6° F [22° C]) | |
c: | cool, short summer; less that 4 months over 50° F [10° C] | |
E — Polar climates with no warm season (warmest month below 50° F [10° C]) | ||
Et: | tundra climate (warmest month below 50° F [10° C], but above 32° F [0° C]) | |
Ef: | perpetual frost (all months below 32° F [0° C]); such climates persist only over the permanent ice caps |
Consider the weather data for the cities listed in Table 1. Classify the climatic types of these twelve cities using the Koppen symbols (letters).
Figure 1. Climatograph for Aukland, N. Z.
Simple graphs can be constructed for an analysis of climate
and weather data. The method was originated in 1910 and first applied to a
practical problem in 1916. In constructing the graph, two related variables
are plotted on the graph paper. The vertical scale represents temperature
and the horizontal scale represents moisture (humidity or rainfall). The
monthly mean values are plotted as a series of points, one for each month
and the respective points are joined by a line in order of the months. The
polygon thus obtained is termed a
hythergraph
if temperature and rainfall are used, or a climatograph if temperature
and relative humidity are correlated. “Climograph” is a corruption of
the latter term, and has been used to mean both climatograph and hythergraph.
The time unit used may be any period (hour, week, day) but is usually month
or week.
For example, for Aukland, the climatograph would look like Figure 1.
Plot hythergraphs for Barrow, Boston, Cuyaba, Delhi, and Phoenix. Hythergraphs for Boston, Barrow, Cuyaba, and Delhi could probably be put on the same graph with different symbols, while at least Delhi and Phoenix will have to go on separate graphs because of overlapping data points. Perhaps Barrow, Boston, and Delhi could go on one graph and Cuyaba and Phoenix on another. Suggested scales are –20 to 100° F for temperature and 0 to 10 inches for precipitation. As time and interest allow, hythergraphs for the other cities could also be constructed.
Hythergraphs also furnish a convenient means of comparing one season with another. They are convenient and useful for giving a comparison of the climate in a series of localities or to determine the probability limits for the distribution of a particular species of organism. For, example, a composite climatograph can be constructed for a locality or year in which there were large numbers of a given species of insect and compared to a climatograph for another locality or year in which no or few of that species occurred. The index thus obtained is valuable in an analysis of the influence of climatic variations upon the population size of that species.
The data in Table 2 give mean temperature and monthly total precipitation for two different years in an area of southern Illinois. The first year was particularly favorable for a species of moth called the codling moth (a fruit pest) and there were large numbers of these moths in that year. The second year, there were few moths and they were not a problem.
Table 2. Monthly Temperature and
Total Precipitation
for Two Years in a Southern Illinois Codling Moth
Area
Moths Abundant | Moths Scarce | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month | (no.) | Temp. (° F) | Ppt. (inches) | Temp. (° F) | Ppt. (inches) |
Jan | 1 | 35.5 | 0.8 | 36.0 | 1.7 |
Feb | 2 | 26.0 | 2.7 | 28.0 | 1.7 |
Mar | 3 | 40.0 | 1.8 | 42.0 | 4.9 |
Apr | 4 | 53.0 | 3.1 | 53.5 | 5.3 |
May — 1st half | 5A | 59.0 | 2.6 | N/A | N/A |
May — 2nd half | 5B | 68.0 | 1.6 | 63.5 | 5.1 |
Jun | 6 | 77.5 | 1.4 | 73.5 | 3.6 |
Jul | 7 | 81.5 | 2.3 | 78.0 | 3.6 |
Aug | 8 | 74.5 | 3.3 | 74.0 | 5.7 |
Sep | 9 | 68.0 | 3.7 | 68.0 | 1.2 |
Oct | 10 | 57.5 | 5.3 | 57.0 | 1.7 |
Nov | 11 | 46.5 | 4.2 | 43.0 | 1.8 |
Dec | 12 | 35.5 | 0.8 | 36.0 | 1.7 |